备注：已完结
类型：剧情片
主演：格伦·卡特 杰罗姆·普拉顿 Renée Castle Fred Joh
语言：英语
年代：未知
简介： 这部音乐剧DVD取材于耶稣的生平事迹，韦伯创新地将严肃的宗教故事和前卫的摇滚音乐联系起来，是一部艺术表现非常大胆、思想性也极为深刻的作品。如果说《约瑟夫与神奇彩衣》是对圣经故事的图解，那么《万世巨星》从表面上看简直就是对传统的颠覆与反动：上帝的儿子耶稣不再时刻带着圣哲的光环，他有软弱，有动摇，更多的人性代替了神性；犹大卖主也不是出自贪婪，而是出自上帝安排的命运，自杀后的犹大穿着白袍带领一个天使唱诗班向耶稣提出几个哲学问题，耶稣竟然也不知道答案。细心的读者不难看出这样的情节安排和电影《耶稣基督的最后诱惑》的相似之处，与后者一样，该剧刚一推出，便遭到了正统宗教人士的强烈抗议，这反而增加了它的知名度，其插曲《我不知如何爱他》(I don\'t know how to love Him)、《万世巨星》(Superstar)长时间徘徊在各大唱片排行榜上。 笔者感觉此剧的本意和《耶稣基督的最后诱惑》一样，并不在于离经叛道，而是通过曲折的形式表现殉道者对神的服从，因为在该剧的最后，耶稣依照神的安排为人类的罪舍身又复活，并在原谅了他的敌人后升天而去。如果你对基督教有较深了解的话，相信该剧还是能够给你一些不同角度的思考。当然，撇开背景不谈，即便单单作为一出摇滚音乐剧来欣赏，这盘DVD也是不容错过的。该剧的另一个版本是1973年由环球影片公司出品的同名电影。 式圣经片给人更亲切的感觉。安德鲁．莱特韦伯创作的插曲优美动听，全片摄影和剪接都具一流水准。
备注：已完结
类型：喜剧片
主演：威尔·史密斯 伊娃·门德斯 凯文·詹姆斯 安贝·瓦莱塔 朱莉·安·埃默
导演：安迪·坦纳特
语言：英语
年代：未知
简介： 希什（威尔•史密斯 Will Smith 饰）十分准确的把握了男性的弱点：他们在求爱的时候由于过分迫切想得到对方好感，反而会表现笨拙失去魅力。而希什掌握了一套完整的独家的理论，可以帮助男士在头三次约会时候就成功俘获对方的心，这套谋略全面实用，令约会期间的就餐、牵手、接吻，有了指导细则。 这次希什的客户是胖男人阿伯特（凯文•詹姆斯 Kevin James饰）。他生性温顺，却爱上了当红女明星。于是对阿伯特的一番彻底改造在所难免。更重要的是，他竟然在工作中爱上了女明星的跟班记者莎拉（伊娃•门德斯 Eva Mendes饰）。这个自己感情一直空缺的约会指南者，开始尝到爱的气息。但是，好像现实中的爱跟他平时设计的并不一样。屡试不爽的爱情法则，在他身上反而失了灵。也许，他的爱情学问还远远不够精通。
备注：已完结
类型：剧情片
主演：汤米·李·琼斯 艾什莉·贾德 杰伊·布拉泽奥 布鲁斯·格林伍德 约翰·
导演：布鲁斯·贝尔斯福德
语言：英语
年代：未知
简介： 莉比（艾什莉·贾德 Ashley Judd 饰）和丈夫尼克（布鲁斯·格林伍德 Bruce Greenwood 饰）之间的感情十分要好，两人共同养育乖巧可爱的儿子马蒂（本杰明·韦弗 Benjamin Weaver 饰），幸福生活堪称典范。可是，在忽然之间，尼克神秘失踪留下大量血迹，莉比则沦为嫌犯最终锒铛入狱。莉比将马蒂托付给了好友安吉（安娜贝丝·吉什 Annabeth Gish 饰），自己则在狱友玛格丽特（罗马·玛菲娅 Roma Maffia 饰）和伊芙琳（达文尼亚·麦克法登 Davenia McFadden 饰）的帮助下为了洗清罪名而做着不断的努力。 一晃眼六年过去，塔维斯警官（汤米·李·琼斯 Tommy Lee Jones 饰）成为了获得了假释的莉比的监护人，而此时的莉比发现，尼克不仅没有死亡，甚至改头换面带着儿子和安吉过着隐姓埋名的生活。经历了双重背叛的莉比决定反击，而尼克也绝不会坐以待毙，一场充满了阴谋与危险的恶战即将拉开帷幕。
备注：已完结
类型：喜剧片
主演：Matthew Broderick Jeanne Tripplehor
导演：沃伦·莱特
语言：英语
年代：未知
简介： Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.' By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses. Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together. One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature: he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around. While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next: the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with his/her partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken. Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
